It is unbelievable how these social justice warriors don’t understand how pathetically idiotic they are.
What’s a social justice warrior? It’s a derogatory term that’s used to describe those who advocate for progressive values and “PC culture.”
I think the Urban Dictionary defines them best:
A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular blogger or commenter of the moment, hoping that they will “get SJ points” and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are “correct” in their social circle.
The SJW’s favorite activity of all is to dogpile. Their favorite websites to frequent are Livejournal and Tumblr. They do not have relevant favorite real-world places, because SJWs are primarily civil rights activists only online.
“Social justice” bloggers are notoriously zealous and exceptionally nasty people, which has led to the coining of the ironic term “social justice warrior”, or SJW for short.
SJWs – almost all of whom are white, upper-middle-class college students – picture themselves as persecuted, oppressed crusaders for peace and equality. But, upon any level of inspection, this claim immediately falls apart. Anyone who has spent any amount of time on social media has undoubtedly encountered one of these zealots in their time.
If you have had the unfortunate misfortune to have met one of these “people”, you probably have never encountered anyone who was so giddy about their hatred of everything they can find. These are people who, on a regular basis, call for violence and genocide against “oppressors”, whether it’s white people, heterosexual people, thin people, or just anyone who even slightly disagrees with them.
One favorite tactic that SJWs use to quash all opposition is “doxxing” – they will publish the personal information (real name, job, phone number, address, and so forth) of anyone that they deem to have committed an act of “thoughtcrime“, then they will usually encourage people to commit acts of violence against that person in real life and will do their best to have that person fired from wherever they work at like you see in the video above. The woman in the video went on a “doxxing spree” to get the Lyft driver fired. Unfortunately, she was also successful.
I have some questions for these SJWs:
Who gave you the position of being the PC Police?
Who gave you the right to decide what words are acceptable or unacceptable to use?
Who gave you the right to judge someone’s comedy or content as bad and take it away?
Who gave you the right to constrict someone’s creativity(writing, art), because you think that it’s “problematic”?
Who gave you the right to tell someone that their flag, shirt, or figurine sitting on their dash should be banned?!
Still don’t understand what is wrong with Social Justice Warriors?
They complain about racism all the time, yet they’re the one’s who look at nothing but skin color.
They reduce everyone down to their sexuality or race or gender, without giving a crap about someone’s actual personality or character.
They lump everyone who isn’t white into a single category: POC. (People of color, as in everybody except Caucasians.)
SJW’s calculate the worth of a human being based on perceived injustices or wrongs that any group “with a tan” might have received; using selective, narrow, and revised interpretations of history. SJW’s elevate groups that they believe have received the least amount of “privilege” in the past. The idea of privilege is so essential to SJW ideology that a common debate tactic they use is to say “check your privilege,” which roughly translates to, “you must immediately halt or change your speech because your ancestors may or may not have done bad things to women or minority races.”
Their ultimate goal is to silence all speech that they don’t like and which they find offensive while also punishing the speech offender by removing his source of income, venue, ability to speak publicly, and more. As they grow in power, the acceptable range of speech that would “trigger” an SJW witch hunt is becoming more narrow, and those who are high up on the privilege hierarchy (white straight men) have to speak through a careful filter if they don’t want to be subject to an SJW attack.
SJW’s do not believe in objectivity. Instead, speech and ideas must be viewed relatively depending on the source and its intended audience. The feeling of the statement must also be taken into account, which can be affected by current news, cultural moods, and pop trends.
A big chunk of their activism depends on subjective feeling and perceived value of the parties involved. Before any SJW can make a decision on what is right or wrong, she must first know the race, gender, and sexuality of the involved participants so that she can decide whether or not to be outraged. A statement or idea in isolation is not enough for them to come to a conclusion on the acceptability of a statement.
SJW’s make a big show of wanting “equality,” but as the Animal Farm quote goes: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” They absolutely do not believe that a man deserves the same treatment that should be given to a woman of his same race. When they say “equality,” what they really mean is to apply special benefits to protected groups in order to create equality based on their subjective perception and feeling. They even go so far as to claim that women and non-whites can not possibly be racist against white men. If a black woman calls a white man a cracker, honky, redneck, hick, or peckerwood, she’s correcting historical wrongs and injustices, not being a racist individual.
If censorship is not an option, SJW’s attempt to destroy the reputation of the speech offender by labeling him a racist, misogynist, creep, bigot, xenophobe, homophobe, or transphobe. This is one of their most reliable tactics to prime the general public against listening to individuals they don’t like because of the negative weight that such terms still carry.
While labels are still effective today, SJW’s are diluting the power of them through overuse. If the majority of men are decided to be “misogynist,” the general public will become desensitized to hearing it. We are already seeing signs of this whereby SJW’s have to escalate the labels to outright crimes. A tactic I have been seeing lately is accusing men of “sexual harassment,” which is often when a man did nothing more than factually criticize a woman or flirt with her.
Many SJW’s readily admit to serious mental illness and being bullied or mocked as a kid. They have gone on to be bullies themselves on the internet, a platform where physical strength, courage, or defined identity is not needed to be an effective activist. Even though they are confused about how to live their own lives thanks to the lack of values they possess, and many deal with suicide, cutting, or other mental issues that prevent them from reading certain articles without a “trigger warning” to act as a disclaimer to reality, they have no problem telling society how to live.
SJW’s have invented new sexes and sexual preferences, the most popular of which being pansexual, the definition of which can vary depending on which SJW you ask but which comes close to bisexuality. Other inventions include polysexuality, genderqueer, pangender, skoliosexual, and the most curious one of all which assumes a new mammalian life form that science has yet to describe—trigender.
Most Americans support gender equality, believe transgender people should be able to live as they wish, and reject anti-Muslim hate. But social justice warriors have turned these causes into malignant self-parody. Conservatives have long railed against ‘political correctness’; but now, even some progressives are saying that activism based on identity politics, self-righteousness and intolerance toward dissent and error is a dead end.
In closing, SJW’s utilize censorship, discriminate against white men, and disagree with basic human rights concerning due process that has existed in the Western legal canon for centuries. They are against free speech as granted by the US Constitution and don’t believe that all men are created equal. They disregard science and wrongly apply labels, accusations, and criminal allegations to those who dare cross their path. They have determined that some groups should be elevated to receive more benefits and speech rights than others, and have been successful in silencing the speech of those whom they disagree with through their internet witch mobs. They continue to infect every group, platform, and community that they come into contact with. Their goal is not to add value or to create, but to control the flow of ideas and thereby thought. Their values are opposed to Western values.
Social Justice Warriors are a cancer to the Western World, and if they ever become accepted by the masses as a viable way of thinking, The United States Of America is doomed. Social Justice Warriors need to be battled and educated by anyone and everyone that has the ability to use COMMON SENSE!